Why fathers should be present at birth

A deep dive into a little discussed area. It occurred to me that this idea could have a significant impact on our crime problem. In the same way that the court summons men to pay child maintenance, we could summon fathers to be present at the birth of their children even if in handcuffs.

So what’s the big deal about TEDxPortofSpainWomen2013?

Image

Via webcast, we will be joining a global community of like minded women in San Francisco as they share passion around the theme “Invented Here.”   The result: A truly global conversation — from San Francisco to São Paulo to Seoul and now… Trinidad and Tobago! Together we’ll celebrate inventors and designers; thinkers and makers; local problem-solvers and global leaders.

As part of the TEDWomen conference <http://www.ted.com/pages/tedwomen&gt; , the local TEDx events <http://www.ted.com/tedx&gt;  around the world will be surfacing and celebrating innovative people in their own communities.

TEDxPortofSpain has partnered with PLOTT and reached out to our community to identify the individuals and organisations who epitomise the theme “Invented Here.”

Join us for the webcast from 1:00 – 3:00 pm, then head for the Plotters Market Place.

Get the full run down at – <https://www.facebook.com/PlottPowerfulLadiesOfTrinidadAndTobago/events#!/photo.php?fbid=460999374010455&set=a.337893289654398.72187.215421035234958&type=1&theater&gt;

Head here for registration – <https://plott.wufoo.com/forms/registration-form/ .

Making HSSE a way of life … (Written for the Linkage)

Recently a young mechanic died because he was pinned to the ground by a vehicle which he was repairing … a couple was run over by a vehicle and killed while crossing a highway at night.  These two incidents and several others have led me to consider some of the reasons why we continue to witness such casual disregard for basic rules of safety and security.  My preoccupation intensified as we participate in the 17th Annual HSSE Conference hosted by Amcham.

For as long as there has been an energy sector in this country there has been some recognition of the importance of safety in the workplace.  The modern day translation of this notion is the recognition of HSSE (health, safety, security and the environment ).  While we seem to be doing all the right things to entrench an HSSE culture in the workplace, my casual observation of non work behaviours suggests that there is very little acceptance that HSSE is a way of life and not a silo activity to be performed in the office and forgotten once we exit the company’s compound only to be rekindled when we return the following day.  That it is a way of life to be practiced for the greater good seems lost on the majority of the population.  When the model of plan/do/check/act informs all our actions then we would know that HSSE has been truly entrenched.  As long as the incongruence continues between the behaviours in the workplace and other social behaviours, we are not hitting the mark with our HSSE investment.  

What really underpins this question is how do we change behaviour?  Behaviour change begins in the mind.  It  is instantaneous.  Important decisions are long in the decision making process. But once people decide to change behaviour it is as easy and instantaneous as a thought.  The second factor that impacts the decision making process is the outcome or reward.  Once people are clear on the outcomes, behaviour change becomes easy.

The HSSE traction is not strong because we have not engaged people’s hearts and minds around HSSE as a way of life.  If this real engagement continues to elude us, then the 50th Anniversary of HSSE will roll around and the gap between organizational behaviour and other social behaviour will continue to exist.

The heart of the matter lies in the leadership.  An old cliche comes into focus “people do what you do and not what you say”.   While it appears quite inane to say that people are looking for behaviour change in leaders before they change themselves, it is a fact and throughout organizations and the society, people are scrutinizing their leaders, waiting for the right cues and clues.  Not only are they waiting for actions, they are also looking out for reactions.  The way the leadership responds to a particular issue often determines the behaviours exhibited by employees.

Performance outcomes of the organization must be consistent with the tenets that companies are trying to foster in driving HSSE performance. If people are not behaving differently, then nothing is changing.  To get a different outcome, you have to change behaviour.  One way of supporting behaviour change is to focus on data to inform your communication.  A note of caution however is that “big number” outcomes often mask a multitude of evils of non compliance issues on the front line.  What would be helpful is a more intense focus on the hundreds of near misses which are hidden.  Systematic implementation of methods of capturing near misses will provide the data necessary to inspire behaviour change.  When it is known that data underpins the communication message, the level of credibility immediately increases.  

In addition to the leadership, the entire company needs a clear understanding of the HSSE goals and objectives.  They must be written in language that is clear, concise and easily understood by the employees.  In other words, it is necessary to speak in the language of the person with whom you are communicating.

From the viewpoint of process, the lines of communication at all levels must be clearly established and known to all.

In this age of instant communication, employees expect to receive short, sharp messages which are to the point and deliberate.  

Entrenching HSSE as a way of life requires the coming together of four elements: the management processes or systems must be identified and robust, the communication mechanisms must be evident and known to all, the organizational arrangements must be designed to encourage persons to think and act differently and mechanisms to sustain the behaviour change must be institutionalized.

 

In general, for organizations to entrench HSSE as a way of life, they have to apply the same degree of expertise and maintain the same standards that are applied to their core business activities to all aspects of health, safety, security and the environment.  It is the only way to effectively minimize risks and prevent harm to people.  

We are reminded that behaviour change is preceded by thought.  It takes but a moment to decide to do the right thing.  Delivering behaviour change is easier than we think and often a lot more fun.

When we reduce the incidents of death because of crossing a highway in the night or being crushed to death by a vehicle which slipped off the jack, we would have signalled that HSSE is a way of life.  Until then, it is a work in progress that requires continuous communication.

Other countries have institutionalized HSSE so there is no need to build a new bridge when other people have mastered the art of bridge building.  We need not waste time and energy re-inventing the wheel, we simply need to use the same template others have used to communicate the value of making HSSE a way of life.

We need a ‘First Lady’?

We need a ‘First Lady’?

I have struggled with finding the difference between the role of the wife of the Prime Minister and the wife of the President.  My bias is that the wife of the President has an excellent opportunity to provide  a gentle kind of leadership in Trinidad and Tobago.  The wife of the Prime Minister may be too close to the cut and thrust of the politics.  This article captures my thoughts on the role of the wife of the President and was originally written for the Newsday.  It is being reproduced on my blog.  Here’s the link http://www.newsday.co.tt/businessday/0,182915.html.  The actual text as it appeared in the Newday follows:

CONGRATULATIONS to the newly appointed “First Lady” Mrs Reema Harrysingh-Carmona.

From where I sit, she has a unique opportunity to craft a different role for the “First Lady” of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. If Trinidad and Tobago ever needed an example of a modern women with dignity, poise and finesse it is now and I am placing my hopes on this new “First Lady”.
In our 51-year-old Republic, it matters tremendously that our “First Lady” be a mirror for young women as they strive to express their authentic selves. It matters that she carry the role in such a manner that no one feels alienated. It will be hard work but Mrs Carmona has a fascinating opportunity to demonstrate leadership.
My vision is for a “First Lady” who can use the power of “her office” to further women’s issues but still retain her stature as the lady.
“A women’s think-tank” could be established. This would provide a wonderful opportunity to reflect the diversity of our society by harnessing the brain power of our women of substance. “Think tanks” promote discussion and provide suggestions for solving problems. Given the pivotal role played by women in society, the furtherance of issues critical to them directly impacts every aspect of society and consequently will redound to the general good.
The range of issues which could be championed by a “First Lady” is unending. Our society continues to cry out for role models and effective leaders.
The story of our new “First Lady” will unfold and she has an opportunity to craft the story line and implant the actors. My sense is that there is a large segment of the population just waiting to lap up each chapter of her story.
There is the continuing discussion about morals, values and the nurturing of our young people. This might just provide the opportunity for our “First Lady” to throw resources behind a project aimed at capturing the hearts and minds of the masses as we hammer out a set of common values which are Trinidadian. A limitation might be that there is a no line item in any budget to facilitate such an activity but that is really a matter of the bureaucracy.
Annually Carnival provides opportunity for a discussion of the role of women and the importance of how we dress and wine. On the surface, the discussion might appear to be trivial however it really speaks to the issue of the changing expectations and roles. Is there an opportunity here for a “First Lady” to encourage quality discourse and possibly sponsor research which could add value to this public debate?
Women continue to push the envelope in all spheres of life. Some even perceive that the glass ceilings are being broken.
If activities in our calypso tents in any way reflect our society then there are issues to be analysed. Looking at the calypso arena the question that comes to my mind is “why are women on stage trying to “out man” the men? And why are these situations given such prominence?
Couldn’t the office of the “First Lady” throw its weight behind a project aimed at exploring the underlying reasons for this and other emerging attitudes?
As T&T continues to mature, there are opportunities to fashion institutions in ways we find appropriate and functional. The whole question of the behaviour of office holders has to be analysed and defined. When an ordinary citizen overnight becomes a State official what are the things that must change in order for the office holder to carry the role with finesse.
To my mind the role of the “First Lady” in our society is not apparent neither is it prescribed. Nature abhors a vacuum and I trust that as the role of the “First Lady” emerges it will reflect the values and behaviours which the society will find acceptable.