What criteria was used to measure Erla’s performance?

When Erla Harewood-Christopher assumed the role of Acting Commissioner of Police in December 2022 following the vacation of her predecessor, McDonald Jacob I was optimistic that things would change and our approach to crime would improve.  Her official appointment in February 2023 as our country’s first female Commissioner of Police created an even more positive anticipation especially as she pledged to usher in meaningful changes to combat crime and ensure public safety.  Yet at the moment, I am saddened and bereft of hope regarding our ability to reduce crime and in particular, gun violence.

In February 2023, in the Joint Select Committee (JSC) she boldly stated that a reduction in the murder rate would be noticeable in the short term by June, and significantly improved in the long term by December. Fast forward 14 months, and the reality is starkly different. The murder rate continued to soar, leaving us citizens gripped with fear and insecurity, reluctant to venture out of our homes.

Despite this failure to deliver on her promises, Harewood-Christopher finds herself reappointed, raising questions about accountability and the criteria for leadership within the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS).

As the months passed after her reappointment, it became evident that the promised changes were not materializing. So, what went wrong? What measurement were they using for her performance? The fact that she was breathing? That she didn’t fall asleep in meetings?

What criteria should have been used to measure her performance, and how do we tweak it so that she actually ends up effectively combating crime?

Firstly, there needs to be a reassessment of the strategies employed by the TTPS. Rather than solely focusing on reactive measures, such as increasing patrols and arrests, there must be a shift towards proactive, community-oriented policing. Building trust between law enforcement and communities is essential for gathering intelligence and preventing crime before it occurs.

Additionally, investment in technology and modern forensic techniques can enhance the investigative capabilities of the police force, leading to higher conviction rates and deterrence.

Furthermore, giving every citizen the mental and financial tools to function in society will help with addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and unemployment, is paramount. Implementing social programs and initiatives aimed at empowering marginalized communities can disrupt the cycle of crime and create a safer society for all.

To reassure citizens of a safe future, transparency and communication are key. The TTPS must be forthcoming about their strategies and progress in tackling crime, fostering trust and collaboration with the public.

While the reappointment of Erla Harewood-Christopher raises concerns about accountability, it also presents an opportunity for reflection and reform within the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service. 

By making clear to the public what benchmarks she must achieve at regular intervals, so we know if she’s actually justifying her salary; by studying various crime-generating situations to see how they can be defused so that strategies can be executed against crime; and by prioritizing community engagement, we can work towards a safer and more secure future for all citizens.  

As of now, I am scared and without hope!

The Parisot-Potter Massy Holding debacle calls for a National Reset

The Parisot-Potter Massy Holding fiasco highlights the issues deeply permeating and plaguing our country, where the absence of properly thought-out systems, structures, and processes leads to dysfunctionality and unwarranted drama.

Massy’s General Counsel released information at their Annual General Meeting accusing the Board of Directors of misusing precious foreign exchange for dubious and costly training exercises. The fact that she raised this concern with the Board, and appears to have been ignored, leading her to release the information publicly suggests an apparent inability to find common ground at such a high level.  This triggers a potential cultural issue that may permeate the entire organisation, ultimately affecting its customers. 

After the General Counsel “hit the ball out of the stadium” the Board responded in a news release, saying they were “appalled at the conduct”, and mentioned the initiation of a “disciplinary process to review Ms. Parisot-Potter’s conduct at the AGM.”  

Think again, Massy!  The apparent lack of a proactive strategy by your Board of Directors and the group CEO, resulted in a knee-jerk reaction to salvage the company’s public image after the matter has become widespread.  I wonder what was the internal response to the initial 13-page document of allegations by Ms. Parisot-Potter!

The tone of the news release suggests undeniable embarrassment, leading one to anticipate potential termination or removal. However, a more constructive approach would have been to acknowledge the incident openly and shift the narrative toward implementing strategies to enhance communication across the company.

Massy, the primary focus should now be on devising a comprehensive recovery strategy and identifying necessary actions. Rather than dwelling on punitive measures, consider fostering an environment that encourages open communication, internal cohesion, and a commitment to addressing concerns constructively. This proactive stance promotes transparency and can position Massy as an organisation committed to continuous improvement and resilience in the face of challenges.

My interest in this Parisot-Potter Massy Holding situation stems from the realization that issues of inadequate structures, systems, and processes extend beyond the public sector, affecting the private sector as well. It’s a call for our country to reset, implementing robust frameworks that foster accountability and transparency in both public and private organizations.

Vote based on shared principles

VOTING has evolved into a commercial enterprise within our twin-island republic. Over the past six decades, it has shifted from a genuine act of civic engagement to a mere transactional activity.

My mother-in-law (the late Hannah Demming) and her contemporaries lobbied for universal adult suffrage and for women to be given the right to vote. They understood the true significance of participating in the democratic process. They were also proud champions of women’s rights.

Sadly, our society has transformed and, in today’s world, there are people who promote political parties because they are being paid; some for cash and a T-shirt, while others expect to get a house, or a contract, or a job. Our two race-based political parties are allegedly guilty of purchasing votes.

In 2010, the coalition of the People’s Partnership, made up of five political parties-the United National Congress, the Congress of the People, the Tobago Organisation of the People, the Movement for Social Justice and the National Joint Action Committee-won the general election.

An Express article of July 7, 2015, reported a statement by then-opposition leader Dr Keith Rowley that ‘government ministers are handing out hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash to buy votes in the upcoming general election’.

Another disconcerting example of voter purchasing was highlighted in a television interview featuring a woman who openly admitted to attending a protest solely for financial gain.

In these instances, individuals were paid to lend their presence to political events, neither with genuine commitment to the party they support nor an understanding of the value systems to which they ascribe. The disconcerting truth is that our leaders and their close-support circle begin their journey with corruption and expect that when they get into office, they will somehow transform these supporters.

These payments from political parties extend beyond mere cash transactions. The phrase ‘who has more food feeds more fowl’ sadly captures the prevailing sentiment in our society, reflecting a transactional approach to civic engagement.

The deeply disheartening issue is that we do not understand this is an artificially created situation engineered over decades to benefit a few people, among whom are members of the government and opposition alike.

We have been artificially kept in a state of lack for decades. We should have been the most developed Caribbean country, but our income has frequently been diverted to places unknown.

Critical infrastructure has been ignored; major water lines, healthcare services, education systems, even traffic control have not been adequately maintained, even though we made billions of dollars of foreign currency reserves. Because this has happened, politicians now have a condition where they can buy votes to stay in power while delivering nearly nothing to their employers (the general public).

The true impact of voter buying is that it has diminished the fundamental democratic right for citizens to express their civic duty.

As a society, we stand at a crossroads, with an opportunity to redefine our values and practices. Initiating this change at the political level is where we need to begin. We must encourage citizens to vote for a party based on shared principles, rather than inducements. This shift in perspective can pave the way for more genuine and principled democratic participation, restoring the true spirit of voting as a powerful tool for civic expression.

We owe it to ourselves and our children to shift voting from a transactional activity to a genuine act of civic engagement. It is time to take back the power we surrendered (our votes) so that we can, for ourselves, decide how our country should grow.